Wolves are dead. Burnley have one win in 23 league games and are functionally already in the Championship. But below them, four clubs are locked in a survival fight so tight that the Opta supercomputer has West Ham and Spurs both inside the bottom three by season’s end — separated by a single point — while Forest and Leeds cling on above the line with margins that would give even the most composed manager nightmares.
This is your tactical breakdown of the teams who matter. How they’re set up, what’s changed under new managers, and which of them has the psychological makeup to survive six brutal weeks of Premier League football with everything on the line.
The Table as It Stands
The relevant part of the standings heading into GW34 — with Wolves effectively confirmed and Burnley surely following:
- 15th: Leeds United — 8 points above the drop. Breathing room, but not comfort.
- 16th: Nottingham Forest — In the mix, fixtures get harder. Need points now.
- 17th: Tottenham Hotspur — Not won a league game in 2026. De Zerbi yet to turn it around.
- 18th: West Ham United — Opta predicts they finish here. One point below Spurs.
- 19th: Burnley — 12 points from safety. Gone.
- 20th: Wolves — 15 points from safety. Mathematically alive, practically finished.
The maths is brutal. Six games left. West Ham and Spurs both need something close to a perfect run. Forest need at least three wins from six. Leeds can afford a couple of bad results but can’t go into a tailspin. None of them has the fixture list they’d want.
West Ham: Leaky, Desperate, and Running Out of Road
West Ham have conceded 54 goals this season. Let that sit. In a league where the top teams are averaging around 1.4 goals per game against, West Ham are shipping 1.6 per 90 minutes. Their xPts — expected points based on chance quality — sits at 34.2 against their actual 28. They’re getting less than they should from their performances and their defensive structure isn’t getting better.
The tactical problem at West Ham is structural rather than personnel. They set up in a 4-2-3-1 that relies on the two holding midfielders screening a back four that is consistently isolated in transition. When the press breaks down — and it breaks down too often — the runners in behind find space that shouldn’t exist at this level. Against a quality side they’re exploitable. Against Everton in GW34 — a side with nothing to play for — the intensity imbalance should favour the Hammers, but relying on opponent motivation gaps to survive relegation is not a plan.
Bowen is their quality. When he gets the ball in space and runs at defenders, West Ham look genuinely dangerous. The problem is they can’t generate that consistently from open play — their shot volume of 285 is one of the lowest in the league. They’re too dependent on individual moments rather than systematic chance creation. And in a run-in where systematic quality tends to win out, that’s a problem.
Opta gives them 49% chance of going down. That sounds close to a coin flip — but when you look at the underlying numbers, it might actually be generous.
Tottenham: The De Zerbi Effect — But Where Is It?
Roberto De Zerbi was supposed to change everything. The man who made Brighton one of the most tactically sophisticated teams in Europe, who built a system of positional play and high pressing so distinctive that clubs across the continent tried to replicate it. He arrived at Spurs to save their season and has yet to win a league game in 2026.
The problem isn’t the philosophy — it’s the personnel. De Zerbi wants to press high, recycle quickly and dominate through positional superiority. Spurs’ squad was built for a completely different style. They’re playing his system with players who don’t instinctively move the way he wants, who press inconsistently, and who lose their defensive shape when the high press is beaten. The concession of a 2-2 draw against Brighton in injury time last week — when a win would have lifted them out of the drop zone — was a brutal example of a team that doesn’t know how to defend a lead under pressure.
Their shot volume has improved slightly under De Zerbi (291 shots total, up from the Scott Parker period) but their defensive fragility is the real issue. He’s brought more attacking intent but the defensive instability that cost them points all season hasn’t been fixed in a matter of weeks. With fixtures against Wolves (away, survivable), Brighton, Aston Villa, Leeds and Chelsea still to come, the run-in is winnable in theory. But Opta has them at 49.5% probability of relegation, and the stoppage-time equaliser against Brighton tells you more about this team than any tactical analysis can.
Nottingham Forest: Reformed But Fragile
Forest’s situation is different in character to West Ham and Spurs. They’re not in immediate danger — they’re above the drop zone — but their run-in includes Sunderland away, Chelsea away and Newcastle at home in a sequence that could see points evaporate fast if they lose confidence.
The tactical rebuild at Forest over the last two seasons has been real. They now set up in a compact 4-4-2 that defends deep, hits on the counter and relies heavily on Gibbs-White and their wide midfielders to generate chances from transition. The problem is that their chance creation is inconsistent — 342 shots this season puts them higher than several non-relegation clubs, but their conversion and defensive stability have fluctuated wildly.
The key GW34 fixture for Forest is Sunderland away. On paper, it’s a game they should take points from — Sunderland are comfortably mid-table with nothing at stake. In practice, away games against sides with no pressure are notoriously difficult for teams carrying relegation anxiety. Forest need to impose their counter-attacking structure quickly, control the transition and avoid the kind of passive, nervous performance that has cost them in similar situations. Their xPts of 35.7 vs 28 actual points suggests they’ve been unfortunate — the underlying quality is there. But they need to actually translate it.
Leeds: The One With Breathing Room — For Now
Eight points above the drop zone sounds comfortable. In a normal season, it would be. With six games left, it’s genuinely safe — but only if Leeds stop doing what they’ve been doing all season, which is playing attractive attacking football, generating good xG numbers, and then collapsing defensively to concede goals that undo everything.
Under Daniel Farke, Leeds play a high-energy 4-2-3-1 that creates real chances in the final third. Their xG numbers are mid-table quality, not relegation-zone quality. But their defensive xGA is one of the worst in the division — they concede shot after shot from poor positioning and transition errors that a better-coached defensive unit simply wouldn’t allow. The thumping 3-0 win over Wolves last week was a statement, but Wolves are terrible. The real test is whether Leeds can hold a lead when the opposition is actually good.
Their remaining fixtures — Bournemouth away, Burnley home (winnable), Spurs away, Brighton home, West Ham away on the final day — are manageable if they stay organised. The Bournemouth trip this Saturday is the most important. Lose that and the eight-point cushion starts to feel less comfortable very quickly.
What This Means for Your Stardraft Team
Relegation-threatened clubs generate specific Stardraft-friendly stats in ways that purely football analysis often misses. Here’s the sharp version:
Desperation inflates defensive stats. When a club is fighting for their lives, their defensive intensity increases. More tackles. More interceptions. More clearances. On Stardraft — where defenders earn 1.5pts per aerial won, 1pt per tackle won and 1.5pts per key pass — a desperate centre-back pairing in a must-win game can post double the Stardraft score of the same player in a meaningless mid-table fixture. West Ham’s centre-backs this weekend are actually worth monitoring for exactly this reason.
Set pieces go up in relegation games. We’ve tracked the league-wide set piece surge all season — 25.4% of goals from dead balls vs 20.6% last season. In relegation fixtures, that number goes higher still. Teams under pressure drill specific set piece routines, deliver balls into the box with more intent, and take more risks on attacking set pieces because a goal could mean survival. For Stardraft managers, targeting the set piece deliverers and aerial threats in these fixtures earns crossing points, aerial duel points and the goals themselves.
Bowen remains the differential of the week. West Ham’s tactical system under their current setup funnels attacking responsibility through Bowen more heavily than almost any other team routes through a single player. His shot and key pass involvement per game is the highest at the club by a significant margin, and in a must-win home game, that concentration of attacking intent on one player is a Stardraft gift at his current ownership level.
The Verdict: Who Survives?
Leeds are safe unless they completely implode. Forest have enough points and enough fixtures they can win to stay up. That leaves West Ham and Spurs in the two remaining drops alongside the already-doomed Wolves and Burnley — and Opta’s models agree.
West Ham’s defensive numbers are the worst of the four, their fixture list the hardest, and their xPts gap the most damning. Spurs, despite De Zerbi’s arrival, haven’t solved the defensive fragility that’s defined their season. A late equaliser against Brighton in a game they led with three minutes to go tells you everything about their mental fragility under pressure.
Forest and Leeds, for all their flaws, have the points buffer and the fixture schedulability to get over the line. The final day — West Ham vs Leeds at the London Stadium — might settle it.
For your Stardraft squad, back the desperate clubs for defensive stat inflation, pick Bowen as your relegation-battle differential, and avoid the GKs of Wolves and Spurs in what could be a chaotic 90 minutes at Molineux on Saturday.
For more tactical analysis every week check out the Stardraft blog, subscribe to the Stardraft podcast on Spotify
Comments are closed